Education Policy Matters Blog

Category Archives

Subscribe


Education Policy Matters Blog

Thoughts on the Strongsville (OH) Teachers Strike

For the second day children attending public schools in Strongsville, OH went to school but their teachers were not there. Substitute teachers have been called in to keep schools in Strongsville open after contract negotiations between the Strongsville City Schools and the Strongsville Education Association (SEA) fell apart. At issue here is teacher pay. 

SEA charges that teachers have not received a raise since 2008. While that statement has some truth to it, it is deceiving. Teachers in Strongsville as in most school districts are paid according to a salary schedule. On a salary schedule, teachers are paid based on their years of service and their academic credentials. What is true is that the salary schedule in Strongsville has not been changed since 2008. However, teachers in Strongsville have all continued to get raises in pay every year as they gained years of experience and in some cases earned additional degrees. So again, to say that teachers in Strongsville have not received a raise since 2008 is misleading. 

I am an advocate for good teachers. I believe good teachers should be paid a wage commensurate with their experience, expertise, and performance. However, I am not a proponent of teacher salary schedules in any form, as they assume that teachers with the same number of years of experience and the same academic credentials are the same. We all know that is not true. Some teachers with five years of experience and a masters degree are awesome; and some teachers with five years of experience and a masters degree are terrible. Yet with a teacher salary schedule, that awesome teacher is compensated in the same way the terrible teacher is compensated. That is ludicrous!

But here is my two cents on the Strongsville teachers strike: I find it more and more sickening that any group would hold children's education hostage in order to better their bargaining position. That's it; that's how I feel. Teachers in Strongsville arguing that they are striking for the children are not being truthful. They are not striking for children; they are striking for higher wages. I am not saying higher wages are bad; I think most of us would take higher wages if we could get them. But it is shameful to pretend that this strike is about something that it is not. The strike is about the teacher salary schedule in Strongsville. The strike is not about children.

Why There Is No Charter School Law in Kentucky

I run into friends and colleagues quite often (in Kentucky) who are surprised when I tell them that there is still no law allowing for the creation of charter schools in Kentucky. I would say their surprise is warranted given that 47 states and the District of Columbia now have some form of charter school legislation. So today's post is for my fellow Kentuckians; those friends and colleagues that after finding that we have no law, ask me why not. The truth my friends is that teacher unions' money and Kentuckians' contentment with our schools have stopped us from passing a charter school law. 

  • Believe it or not, Kentuckians are pretty pleased with the outcomes of our education system. In fact, some of us think our state's schools are pretty darn good!! And maybe they are; the new Quality Counts rankings in Edweek came out just today and Kentucky ranked #14 in the nation! Out of sight!! Never mind the enormous, shameful achievement gaps that have persisted for generations in schools all across Kentucky; or that there are schools in parts of our state that should be shut down and never reopened; or that only a small fraction of our high school graduates leave high school prepared for the rigors of college. If you can just get past those little things, we're really doing a hell of a job in Kentucky! And who would have thought it? I know I had no idea. It is truly the best kept secret in America. But probably not for long; with the release of the Quality Counts rankings we are likely to have a hard time keeping parents from Ohio, Indiana, and Tennessee from sneaking across the state line to get their kids into our Kentucky schools. 
  • Kentucky's teacher unions/professional associations have lots of Democrat legislators under their thumb. These organizations heavily fund the campaigns of many Democrat legislators. The unions pretend that they oppose charter schools on the grounds that charters will be detrimental to Kentucky children, but in reality they oppose charter schools because they would threaten the job security of ineffective teachers. Can't have that, now can we!! So they persuade/bully Democrat leaders in the Kentucky legislature to oppose even open and honest conversations about the issue; and they spread lies to their members (teachers) and to the public about charter schools. And are these legislators willing to stand up to the unions, their campaign funders, and say that we must have an open and honest dialogue about charter schools? Of course they are not. Why not? Because their next election is just around the corner, and they can't count on the parents of children in failing schools to fund their campaigns.
The political landscape in Kentucky is pretty complicated for sure. I don't mean to trivialize or oversimplify the issue, but the simple reality is that Kentucky has no charter school law because Kentuckians are pretty content with the schools we have, and the very well funded teacher unions/professional associations do a great job of keeping the Democrats in the legislature in line. Until one or both of those realities change, there will be no charter schools in Kentucky.

Arnold Foundation to Invest $25 million in New Orleans Charter Schools

The Laura and John Arnold Foundation announced last week its latest investment in school reform in New Orleans. Following multi-million dollar investments in charter schools, school choice, and teacher recruitment, the foundation announced that that it will invest an additional $25 million to support an initiative to help create and expand high-performing charter schools in New Orleans. The funds are to be managed through New Schools for New Orleans and the Charter School Growth Fund. The initiative's goal is within the next five years, to move 15,000 students attending low-performing schools in New Orleans to high performing charter schools. 

I have made no secret about my position on high quality public charter schools; I favor them, and I favor legislation and legislative changes that allow for their creation and expansion. Charter school reform critics argue that investing in charter schools does not fix broken systems, and I do not disagree with them. But school reform happens one school at a time. So every high quality school that we create for children, whether a traditional public school or a charter school, contributes to the goal of reforming public education in the city of New Orleans. Every additional high quality public school that we create provides that many more opportunities for children currently attending low-performing schools to attend a high-quality school. Anyone who knows me knows how passionate I am about reforming the public school systems that serve our most vulnerable children, but I will not apologize for supporting the creation and expansion of high quality public charter school options as well.

Secretary Duncan Set to Deal with Principal Preparation Reform

Education Secretary Duncan has begun to outline his agenda for President Obama's second term, and principal preparation and evaluation seem to have a place of prominence. Duncan says that attention to principal preparation could come through the use of grant funds from Title II of the Higher Education Act (HEA); these are funds that are to be used for professional development activities and school improvement. We do not have any additional details on what could be in store, but given what we have seen with the USDOE's policy positions on teacher education, things could get pretty interesting.

Why I Left the K-12 Classroom

Pretty often someone asks me why I left the K-12 classroom. Since I am someone who works pretty hard to recruit talented young people into the teaching profession I think that's a fair question. It is no secret that there is a critical shortage of teachers of color, particularly male teachers of color. So why have I chosen to spend my career in the academy instead of in schools where I can have a more direct impact on students?

Let me start by saying that I in no way profess to have been God's gift to the profession; but I do think I was a pretty effective teacher by the time I left K-12 teaching. You might notice that I said by the time I left teaching. That's because I didn't have a clue what I was doing when I started. I owe my growth in teaching to fabulous mentors who spent a lot of time with me during my first few years; four very special ladies in particular: Tina Baptiste (New Orleans Public Schools), and  Rhonda Voiselle, Tanya Bourgeois, and Erin Raiford (St. Charles Parish Public Schools). With their help, I can comfortably say that I got to the point where I was impacting student learning in significant ways.

But what I also learned beginning in my very first year of teaching, was how broken systems and failed education and social policy can create conditions in schools that even the most talented teachers cannot overcome. A teachers is unequivocally the most influential school-level determinant in a child's academic success, and teachers impact the lives of their students in extraordinary ways; but it is very hard to fix broken system and influence policy from the classroom. Most effective teachers that I have known spend well over 40 hours a week on their planning, instruction, and assessment. So while I loved my job as a middle school and high school teacher, I realized pretty early on that I wanted to work to change systems and influence policy. That's why I returned to graduate school to earn a PhD, and why I took a faculty position at a research university.

I see my job now as preparing high quality teachers and leaders for schools, and working to change policy to create conditions where teachers in our most challenging schools and districts have a much better shot at impacting student learning in significant ways. That's what I try to do everyday here at the University of Kentucky, and I want all of you to hold me accountable to that.

Chicago Teachers Strike Over Issues of Teacher Evaluation, Performance, and Accountability

As most of you have heard, 350,000 children enrolled in Chicago Public Schools are not in school today. Talks broke down between the Chicago Teachers Union and Chicago Public Schools over the weekend and Chicago Teachers Union officials made the decision to go on strike. It does not appear that the major points of difference between the Union and the school district are salary or working conditions. Instead, the major sticking points seem to surround issues of maintaining current health benefits, teacher evaluation, teacher performance, and teacher accountability. 

Obviously, the finer details of negotiations are not widely known at this point, but aside from negotiations over health benefits, it seems that the movement to have teachers held directly accountable for students' performance is at the center of this strike.  Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis has said that the school district's proposed changes to teacher evaluation rely much too heavily on students' standardized test scores, and the changes would likely result in 6,000 teachers (30% of the Union's membership) being dismissed from their jobs within the next two years. 

What educators and observers should take note of here, and from similar though less widely publicized debates across the country, is that teachers WILL be held directly accountable for students' performance on standardized examinations. It would be unrealistic and unfair to have the results of standardized exams be the sole measure of teacher effectiveness, but it is equally unrealistic and unfair to move forward without students' performance on those exams factor into teacher evaluations in some significant way. Our challenge is to use those data in an appropriate manner for evaluating teachers, but the performance data must be used. No longer will teachers' evaluations be completely subjective without student performance data factoring into how administrators rate their performance.

So while I do not know the details of Chicago Public Schools' proposed changes to their teacher evaluation system, I believe it would be best if conversations between unions and school districts across the country centered on how to most appropriately use standardized test data as a part of teacher evaluation systems and not whether these data will be used at all. If standardized test data are used appropriately to evaluate teachers, the number of ineffective teachers that lose their jobs should be a secondary concern. Our primary concern in this matter should be whether there are effective teachers in our children's classrooms.

Involuntary Teacher Transfers Challenged in Court (Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools, North Carolina)

A pretty interesting personnel battle is brewing between a superintendent and two teachers in the Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools in North Carolina. Superintendent Thomas Forcella has attempted to transfer two teachers from Chapel Hill High School to two other high schools in the district. The teachers, however, have taken their cases to court, challenging their transfers on the grounds that the superintendent has no cause to move them. Chaper Hill High School is getting a new principal this year, and the superintendent alleges that the transfers were ordered to try to head off dissention/insubordination by those teachers. The teachers argue that nothing of the sort is found in their personnel files, and that the superintendent's attempt to transfer them is baseless.

Superior Court Judge Elaine Bushfan said last week that she would make a decision relatively quickly on whether she would grant the teachers a stay until their appeals are heard in a few months. This case has pretty significant implications for school board policy and administrative procedures regarding the involuntary transfer of staff. Superintendents and school board members in North Carolina and across the country should follow this one pretty closely as it unfolds.

Teacher and Leader Preparation-A Few Areas for Improvement

As I prepare to facilitate a conversation with my College of Education colleagues tomorrow on the future on teacher and leader preparation, I am spending some time tonight reflecting on what I think we are doing well with educator preparation and where I believe we still have considerable ground to cover. Here are just a few places that I hope our conversation goes to tomorrow:

I would like us to begin to be much more intentional about the students we recruit into teacher preparation programs. I believe greater emphasis in teacher education has recently been placed on being intentional with the selection of students; but I contend that we are missing out on more than a few likely teaching superstars because we do not go after them. The reality is that high ability students usually have options.The teaching profession gets its share of high ability students, but we also get our share of students that couldn't do much else. That has to change. Preparation programs must begin to target and compete for the high ability, diverse pool of candidates needed to do the demanding job that teaching is.

Next, too many teachers are leaving our programs without a sufficient grasp of the content area that they plan to teach in. This has gone on for quite some time now, with students in elementary schools and in hard-to-staff schools bearing the brunt of this ridiculousness. There is absolutely no excuse for this. Our programs cannot continue to be so lacking in rigor that a candidate finishes a mathematics education degree program in good standing yet does not know mathematics well enough to teach it at a high level. The fact that this scenario is more common than not in some places is reprehensible, and it is a clear indicator that some programs are not worthy of the public's trust.

Finally, with the occasional exception, neither teacher nor leader preparation programs are doing a particularly good job of preparing educators to teach or to lead in the diverse school and district settings which most of them will work in. The majority of our programs continue to prepare educators to teach Ward and June Cleaver's children; nevermind the fact that Jerry Mathers who played "The Beaver" in the 50s sitcom probably now has great-grandchildren in school. The US has changed considerably over the last few generations. In most ways US families and children in 2012 are very different than they were generations ago. Teacher and leader preparation programs must embrace these realities and do a better job of preparing students for the settings that await them.





Teacher Career Ladders-It's Time

As we begin another school year, one of the educational leadership and policy areas that I hope we can begin to make some progress on is creating career-ladders for teachers. There is consensus in the research literature that the classroom teacher is THE most important school-level factor for impacting student learning. Leadership is extremely important, but the relationship between leadership and student learning is an indirect one. Classroom teachers' impact on student learning is direct and it cannot be overstated.

With that said, one of the issues that we face in education is keeping highly effective teachers in classrooms. This is difficult for a variety of reasons, including community variables, income, working conditions, etc. Attracting high quality teachers into teaching is a challenge, and keeping them there can pose a challenge as well. It is no secret that a significant number of our teachers leave the profession completely. Neither is it a secret that some of our most capably teachers are attracted to higher-paying, higher-status positions in administration. As I said previously and as you will hear me say over and over again, our schools need good leaders; but possibly even more important, our schools need really good teachers in classrooms.

Educational leaders and policymakers will have to begin to wrap their heads around possibilites for building career ladders for our most capable teachers that do not take them out of classrooms completely. A highly effective teacher should not feel like he or she has to move out of the classroom to move up the career ladder in education. As it currently stands in many school districts, a first year teacher has the same job description, responsibilities, and expectations as a 20-year veteran master teacher. The emphasis in some of our states and districts on the development of teacher leaders gets at some of the policy possibilities for teacher career-ladders, but I believe that at this point we are only scratching the surface. It's time to move this conversation forward.

A Vision for School Leadership

The importance of effective school leadership cannot be overstated. For many years research has consistently pointed to the classroom teacher as having the most significant impact of all school-level agents on a student’s learning. Understanding that, one of the key roles of the principal is to ensure that the school is a place that supports teachers in ensuring student learning. That responsibility entails many things, all of which are detailed in the Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium’s (ISLLC) standards for school leadership. These standards calls on school leaders to promote the success of all students through the development and implementation of a school vision, creating and sustaining a school culture that is conducive to learning, effectively managing school operations, collaborating with internal and external school stakeholders, leading with integrity, and advocating for and acting on behalf of children within the larger state, national, and international education contexts.

District and state leaders must make a top priority of getting a highly effective principal into every school. There is no substitute for effective school-level leadership. Once that effective leader is in place, s/he must be given the authority to make real decisions. I find it unfortunate that in some places we have dramatically increased the level of accountability for school leaders, but we have restricted their discretion to the point where very little of what goes on in the school is under their control. Principals in too many of our schools are no more than middle-managers, carrying out orders from district administrators. We must continue to hold school leaders accountable for the success of their schools, but in turn, we must give them the authority to make real decisions in their schools.


We must attract, select, and retain highly skilled, passionate leaders in schools that are committed to creating inclusive and nurturing environments and improving learning for all children. Giving these leaders the authority they need to do their jobs would result in schools meeting and surpassing expectations. Throughout my career I have worked with many incredibly intelligent, passionate, and creative school leaders, and I know that we have the human resources to turn some of our poorest performing schools into exemplary communities of learning. We can start by eliminating outdated policies and practices that prevent school leaders from doing their jobs. That type of policy reform is an important step toward providing all of our children with a first-rate education.